Every major AI model in the order it shipped — from AlexNet and Google's Transformer paper to trillion-parameter open weights landing weekly. Expand any release to see what actually changed, in plain English.
161
releases tracked
40
labs
83
open weights
New here? How AI grew up, in six steps
The whole timeline below is one story: a system that learned to see, then to read, then to be helpful, then to think, and finally to do the work itself. Pick a step to see only the releases from that era. Swipe the cards sideways.
Three tiers after a staged government-safety review from late June. Sol is tuned for biology, chemistry and cybersecurity, and reported ~54% more token-efficient on coding.
What changed in this release
Three tiers: Sol, Terra and Luna, from strongest to cheapest.
Held back for a staged government safety review before public release.
Sol is reported to be about 54% more token-efficient on coding, and is tuned for biology, chemistry and cybersecurity.
What it means
The safety review is the story. Governments now sit between a frontier model being finished and being released.
Spent inference-time compute on a hidden chain of thought. Opened a second scaling axis after pre-training.
What changed in this release
Thinks privately before answering, sometimes for minutes.
Trained to reason through problems rather than to produce a fluent answer immediately.
Jumped from roughly 13% to 83% on a qualifying exam for the International Mathematics Olympiad.
What it means
A second way to make AI smarter that has nothing to do with size: let it think longer at the moment you ask. This is the origin of every 'reasoning' model below.
The most serious challenger to attention: a state-space model that scales linearly with length instead of quadratically. Influential, but the Transformer held the frontier.
What changed in this release
Attention compares every word with every other word, so doubling the input roughly quadruples the work.
Mamba keeps a running summary instead, so cost grows in a straight line with length — around 5× faster on long inputs.
What it means
The most credible attempt to replace the Transformer. It did not win — attention still holds the frontier — but the ideas turn up inside hybrid models, and it is worth knowing the field did try alternatives.
Open weights that ran on a consumer GPU. Spawned an entire ecosystem of forks, LoRAs and UIs.
What changed in this release
Ran the diffusion process in a compressed space, cutting the compute needed by roughly 50×.
Released the full weights publicly, so it ran on an ordinary gaming graphics card.
What it means
Image generation stopped being something you rented from a company and became something you owned. Both the creative explosion and the flood of misuse start here.
Showed the field had been training models far too large on far too few tokens. Redirected everyone's compute budgets.
What changed in this release
Found that everyone had been building models too big and feeding them too little text.
A 70B model trained on far more data beat a 280B model trained the old way.
What it means
Redirected the industry's spending overnight. Bigger stopped being automatically better, and smaller-but-better-fed models made AI dramatically cheaper to run.
Trained on human preference rankings (RLHF) so the model followed instructions instead of just continuing text. The technique behind ChatGPT.
What changed in this release
Humans ranked competing model answers, and the model was trained to produce what they preferred.
This is 'RLHF' — reinforcement learning from human feedback.
A 1.3B model trained this way was preferred over the 175B GPT-3.
What it means
The step that turned a text-continuation engine into an assistant that does what you ask. Being helpful turned out to be a training choice, not a size problem.
DeepMind's first large-scale LM study, published alongside a detailed harms analysis.
What changed in this release
DeepMind's systematic study of what does and does not improve as models get bigger.
Published alongside an unusually frank analysis of the harms.
What it means
Showed scale helps enormously with knowledge and comprehension, but barely at all with logical reasoning — a gap that took another three years to close.
Trained on 400M image–caption pairs to place pictures and the words describing them in the same space. This is what lets you type a prompt and get a matching image.
What changed in this release
Trained on 400 million image–caption pairs scraped from the web.
Learned to put a picture and the words describing it in the same mathematical space, so 'a dog on a skateboard' sits near an actual photo of one.
Could classify images it was never explicitly trained on, just by comparing against text descriptions.
What it means
The missing link between language and pictures. Typing a prompt and getting a matching image only works because something taught the machine which words go with which visuals — this is that something.
Chopped an image into patches and fed them to a Transformer like words. One architecture now covered both text and vision.
What changed in this release
Cut an image into a grid of small patches and treat each patch like a word in a sentence.
The same Transformer built for text then works on pictures, with no vision-specific machinery.
What it means
One architecture for everything. This is why a single model can now handle text, images, audio and video together instead of needing a separate specialist per sense.
Generate an image by starting from pure noise and repeatedly removing a little of it. The method behind DALL·E 2, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, Sora and Veo.
What changed in this release
Take a real image, add noise step by step until it is static, then train a network to undo one step at a time.
To generate something new, start from pure static and run the undoing process.
More stable to train and higher quality than GANs, which often collapsed.
What it means
This is the engine inside essentially every AI image and video tool you have used — DALL·E 2, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, Sora, Veo. The pictures come from noise.
Bidirectional encoder that dominated NLP benchmarks for years. Encoder-only, so it was never built to be prompted.
What changed in this release
Read text in both directions at once by hiding random words and learning to fill the blanks.
Set new records across essentially every language-understanding benchmark on release.
What it means
Quietly went into Google Search in 2019 and improved results for millions of queries. Great at understanding text, but it cannot write — it was never built to be prompted.
Threw out recurrence and kept only attention. Every model below this line — GPT, BERT, Claude, Gemini, Llama — is a Transformer.
What changed in this release
Removed recurrence — the old approach of reading text strictly word by word, in order.
Used only 'attention': every word looks at every other word simultaneously and decides what is relevant.
Because it no longer had to wait for the previous word, training could run massively in parallel on many chips at once.
What it means
The single most important paper on this page. Every major model after 2018 — GPT, BERT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, all of them — is a Transformer. The parallelism it unlocked is what made training on the entire internet financially possible.
Won ImageNet by such a margin that the entire field switched to deep neural networks within a year.
What changed in this release
Trained a deep neural network on two consumer graphics cards instead of ordinary processors.
Cut the ImageNet photo-labelling error rate from about 26% to 15% — a bigger jump than the previous several years combined.
What it means
This is the moment computers got genuinely good at seeing. Almost every AI advance since traces back to the realisation that gaming graphics cards could train neural networks.
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) read text one step at a time, but forgot the start of a paragraph by the end. LSTM gave them a memory that lasted, and ran speech recognition, translation and text generation for two decades — until the Transformer removed recurrence entirely.
What changed in this release
Plain recurrent networks (RNNs) read a sequence one step at a time, carrying a running memory — but that memory faded within a few dozen steps, so they forgot the start of a paragraph by the end of it.
LSTM added gates that explicitly decide what to keep, what to discard and what to output, so information could survive hundreds of steps.
What it means
The architecture behind roughly two decades of sequence AI — Google Translate, Siri, autocomplete. It is also what the Transformer replaced: reading strictly one step at a time cannot be parallelised, which capped how large these models could ever get.
Open weightsText
Dates are public announcement dates, compiled 28 Jul 2026 from lab documentation, release trackers and public reporting. Anthropic and the pre-2019 research papers are checked against primary sources; the rest are corroborated across independent trackers, and a handful of 2026 dates differ by days between them. Covers the foundational architectures (2012–2017) and foundation-model releases from named labs since — not fine-tunes, distills, quantizations, or per-size variants of a family already listed.